![]() Mr Chalker immediately thought it 'a fairly important case', but one that 'required a lot of feet on the ground and a lot of intensive field investigations'. ![]() When they arrived at their destination, her husband and friends, and eventually even Ms Cahill, laughed it off.īut about midnight, driving home on the same road, she and Andrew apparently saw what she believed to be the same lights 'hanging above the road'.īill Chalker called Kelly Cahill's case "an extraordinary lost opportunity". like nothing I had ever seen before', she wrote in her book. ![]() They were en route to a friend's house when Ms Cahill saw in a paddock a row of five or six large orange lights on a 'distinct circular shape. So was her 'encounter' a missed opportunity, or just another UFO hoax? 'Hooded figures with glowing eyes'Īccording to Ms Cahill, she and her then-husband Andrew were driving along the Belgrave-Hallam Road in Narre Warren on that fateful winter's night in 1993. Cult TV show The X-Files even referenced the case in an episode.īut 27 years on, the truth about the so-called Eumemmering Creek encounter is anything but clear.Ī detailed report into the claims was never released, the other witnesses never came forward publicly and Ms Cahill disappeared from public view. It was the one with the potential to provide definitive proof, once and for all, that the truth was out there. Kelly Cahill, as she appeared in her 1996 book Encounter ( Supplied) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |